The U.S. Air Force recently made headlines by releasing an archive filled with pictures of weather balloons and other objects, purportedly from Roswell, New Mexico. The decision to release this collection has reignited conversations around the events that unfolded in Roswell in 1947, drawing a new wave of scrutiny and debate. However, rather than providing clarity, these newly disclosed archives have generated more questions than answers, leading many to wonder if this is another tactic to cloud the ongoing disclosure movement.

The USAF has a long history of issuing varying explanations for the events at Roswell, often veering between the plausible and the far-fetched. In an attempt to close the chapter on the Roswell case once and for all, the Air Force had previously issued a “Roswell Case Closed” report. This report went through significant changes over time, including the removal of certain key individuals from the narrative. Yet, these changes often raise more questions than they answer. For instance, the USAF decided to remove the reference to W. Glenn Dennis, who was once President of the UFO Museum, despite having his legal affidavit on file. Such decisions inevitably make one wonder what prompted these selective omissions.

Now, let’s consider the latest “evidence” presented in the newly released archives. If the Air Force’s aim was to lay to rest the Roswell conspiracy theories, it appears to have fallen short. One of the most glaring inconsistencies is the timeline. The archive contains images of weather balloons and “anthropomorphic test dummies” that were part of experiments conducted years after the 1947 events. This mismatch alone casts a shadow over the authenticity of the documents. Add to that the claim that some of these balloons and projects didn’t even exist at the time of the Roswell incident, and you have a compelling case against the recent disclosure.

Perhaps even more questionable is the audacity with which the Air Force has presented these as definitive explanations. In previous statements, the Air Force had recanted the weather balloon story, switching their narrative to a Mogul balloon—a type of spy balloon. Yet here we are, decades later, back to the weather balloon explanation. It’s this consistent inconsistency that gives fuel to the skepticism surrounding the Air Force’s intentions.

One argument that has been made in favor of these regular shifts in narrative is that they serve as a smokescreen. The idea is that by continually changing the story, the real facts become lost in a sea of disinformation. In that regard, these new releases serve as perfect fodder for those who wish to muddy the waters. Given the rise of the disclosure movement and increasing public demands for transparency about unidentified aerial phenomena, it’s worth asking whether this is a calculated move to throw off the public discourse.

The timing of the release also comes at an interesting juncture. Republican Rep. Tim Burchett recently expressed his belief in a government cover-up of a UFO crash in Roswell in 1947. This, along with increasing attention to the topic from high-profile individuals, makes the release seem less like a step toward clarity and more like a reactionary move designed to counteract rising public interest.

When the public is seeking answers, clarity, and honesty, it’s counterproductive to present them with information that only deepens the mystery and adds layers of confusion. Unless the USAF comes clean with a consistent, well-documented explanation that stands up to scrutiny, its credibility will remain in question. As the disclosure movement gains traction, perhaps it’s time for those in positions of power to realize that the public’s desire for transparency isn’t going away. They may find it increasingly difficult to keep navigating this maze of half-truths and contradictions they’ve constructed.


At this critical juncture, where recent UFO hearings are commanding global attention and a growing movement pushes for full disclosure, the timing of the United States Air Force’s archival release on Roswell is not only suspect but strategically positioned. Far from being an innocent revelation, it seems calibrated to divert public focus and quash burgeoning inquiries. Instead of facilitating a path to truth, the USAF seems intent on scattering seeds of confusion and skepticism, effectively clouding the call for transparency that has gained so much momentum. For the ever-growing number of us committed to unearthing what lies behind the Roswell incident, and indeed, the broader UFO phenomena, this latest ploy serves as a frustrating reminder of the lengths institutions will go to withhold information. Our resolve, far from diminished, is only fueled further. We continue our quest for the truth, armed with a clearer understanding that the tactics of diversion are still very much at play.


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments