The White House Daily Briefing on July 26th was a critical moment in the unfolding narrative surrounding Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAPs). With allegations of UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering programs coming to the fore, it is a matter of intense public interest. Yet, the administration’s response was anything but clear.

Ross Coulthart tweeted out his frustration over the White House’s refusal to address David Grusch’s allegations, openly wondering why President Biden wouldn’t dismiss such an allegation if untrue. Daniel Miller (SiCcOp) shared this sentiment, expressing incredulity at the NSC spokesman’s “no comment” response about possessing Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) craft.

Adding to the intrigue, Craig Capel noted a micro-expression by Kirby when asked about Grusch’s crash retrieval (CR) allegations, suggesting that there might be underlying emotions that warrant further scrutiny. Joe Murgia, @TheUfoJoe, acknowledged Kirby’s non-answer, a response that, while frustrating, was at least not a dismissal.

The White House’s reluctance to engage with this issue is puzzling, especially given the recent awareness and acceptance of UAPs. The Pentagon’s commitment to studying UAPs, as expressed by John Kirby, National Security Council Coordinator for Strategic Communications, shows that the government is taking the phenomena seriously. Kirby’s statements acknowledge the potential impact on military training and readiness but fall short of providing concrete information about Grusch’s specific allegations.

The lack of clear answers has led to a growing frustration among those seeking transparency on UAPs. Kirby’s vagueness in response to CNN White House Correspondent Jeremy Diamond’s pointed questions left many unanswered queries. The assertion that the administration is trying to “get smarter” on UAPs, while emphasizing the need for transparency, seems at odds with the lack of direct answers to questions about crash retrievals.

The government’s reluctance to engage openly on this issue has further fueled speculation and intrigue. The White House’s response, or lack thereof, has only added to the public’s curiosity and skepticism.

It’s clear that the dialogue surrounding UFOs has reached a new level, and the demand for transparency is unlikely to wane. What the government knows or doesn’t know about UAPs continues to haunt the public imagination, and the saga seems far from over. The administration’s handling of these questions, as reflected in social media discussions, may become a defining aspect of the broader conversation on UAPs.


In the end, the White House’s elusive response raises more questions than it answers. The statements and non-statements from officials only add to the mystery surrounding UAPs. With growing public interest, the pressure for clear and transparent information will likely continue to mount. The government’s response to these questions, or lack thereof, may become a defining aspect of how the UAP issue is perceived in the public consciousness. Whether the administration will eventually provide more concrete answers remains to be seen, but the conversation is far from over.

For those intrigued by this unfolding story and eager to form their own opinions, watching the direct exchange between the press and National Security Council Coordinator John Kirby during the White House Daily Briefing from July 26th is essential. This embedded tweet from MarikvR (@MvonRen) provides a window into the government’s response to Grusch’s allegations of a secret UAP retrieval and reverse-engineering effort, where the White House avoids a clear denial and instead focuses on the impact of UAP on military training and readiness.


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments