The recent episode of Weaponized, featuring Jeremy Corbell and George Knapp in conversation with guests Ross Coulthard and Bryce Zabel, provided some fascinating insights into the ongoing discussions and controversies surrounding Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs). The panelists dissected the recent congressional hearings on UFOs, a landmark event that signals a shift in the public and governmental perceptions of UFO phenomena.

The revelations from the hearing, as discussed by the panelists, point towards the existence of technology far more advanced than anything currently known to us. The witnesses spoke about objects that were observed hovering for hours and then accelerating at unprecedented speeds. They described objects that could stop mid-air and change direction instantaneously, a capability that defies our current understanding of physics.

In a powerful testament to the impact of these testimonies, the panelists described witnessing these events under oath as an emotional and historically significant moment. It suggests a willingness from individuals involved in these events to be held accountable for their statements, hence lending credibility to their accounts.

One of the most startling claims in the discussion came from David Fravor, a retired US Navy pilot, who was a key witness at the UFO hearings. He presented what was described as a scientific analysis of the “Tic Tac” UFO encounters involving multiple crafts spotted above 80,000 feet, a space domain as per Commander Fravor’s description. This analysis has yet to be seen by the public, symbolizing a tipping point in the disclosure process.

As the conversation unfolded, it was clear that the panelists, and the UFO community at large, are grappling with the process of ‘disclosure.’ This term carries a sense of expectation, suggesting that a complete unveiling of all information related to UFOs is imminent. However, the reality of the situation might be more complex. Disclosure could be a process rather than a single event, a slow unveiling of truths dictated by political, social, and technological factors.

During the discussion, the panelists brought up the issue of over-classification. In the complex world of intelligence and security, the layers of secrecy and the compartmentalization of information often lead to a lack of transparency, even among those with top-level security clearances. These structural issues could hinder full disclosure and only add to the public’s frustration and mistrust.

This episode also touched upon the important role of journalists and whistleblowers in pushing for transparency. Their efforts, often at great personal risk, are instrumental in keeping this conversation alive and in the public eye. The panelists highlighted the responsibility of journalists to protect their sources, demonstrating the ethical considerations inherent in this field of reporting.


The panelists’ fervor and commitment to unveiling the truth about UFOs are palpable throughout the episode. This passion, coupled with their in-depth knowledge and analysis of the subject, makes this episode of Weaponized a must-watch for anyone interested in the future of UFO disclosure.

As the debate on UFOs shifts from the fringes into the mainstream, episodes like this are more crucial than ever. They offer an in-depth look at the complex dynamics surrounding this phenomenon, highlighting the challenges and opportunities presented by this new age of transparency and revelation. It is clear that this conversation is just getting started, and we are all part of a fascinating moment in history.

Watch the full episode here

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments